TechSkill Sector Council (SSC)
Standard AB · Sector Skill Council (SSC) · IT-ITeS · Karnataka
REWS risk band
L · Low
Composite score 0.0
Letter grade
A+88.8
Excellence
Escalation
Routine
0red flag(s)
Renewal readiness
READY – Standard Renewal
Decision matrix actions
Auto-matched from risk band and letter grade
Regulator (NCVET)
Immediate oversight actions
- 1Continue standard annual monitoring cycle.
- 2Publish entity on 'high-performing' public register (transparency incentive).
- 3Fast-track future expansion/territorial-jurisdiction requests.
- 4Consider for peer-mentor role to weaker ABs.
- 5Light-touch renewal (desk-based, reduced documentation).
Awarding Body
Required response & remediation
- 1Maintain self-certification & timely MIS/data submission.
- 2Share good practice with NCVET Research Division for benchmarking.
- 3Sustain trainer certification & QP-NOS currency.
Global TVET precedent
Ofqual 'low-risk' monitoring tier – reduced inspection frequency; ASQA 'standard' renewal; SkillsFuture Singapore public quality-mark listing.
Risk narrative
Plain-English explanation with indicator citations
AB-01 TechSkill Sector Council (SSC) carries a Low REWS risk band (composite risk score 0.0) and letter grade A+ (Excellence) after a 0-point risk-linked deduction from a weighted domain score of 88.8. All 18 REWS indicators currently sit in the Green band relative to configured thresholds. Recommended posture: ROUTINE. Renewal readiness: READY – Standard Renewal. Monitoring cadence: Annual review (standard cycle).
Category health scores
Six REWS categories feeding the composite risk score
Governance Risk
100.0
Weight 15%
Financial Risk
100.0
Weight 20%
Assessment Risk
100.0
Weight 20%
Technology Risk
100.0
Weight 10%
Compliance Risk
100.0
Weight 20%
Training & Outcome Risk
100.0
Weight 15%
Indicator RAG breakdown
Value vs Green / Amber thresholds — Red if past Amber
| Code | Indicator | Value | Green | Amber | Score | RAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Leadership changes (Chairperson/CEO) in last 12 monthsGovernance Risk · Lower · count | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Green |
| G2 | Statutory committees non-functional (Board/Audit/Grievance)Governance Risk · Lower · count | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Green |
| G3 | Unresolved conflict-of-interest cases reportedGovernance Risk · Lower · count | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Green |
| F1 | Net worthFinancial Risk · Higher · Rs Lakh | 250 | 50 | 0 | 100 | Green |
| F2 | YoY revenue growthFinancial Risk · Higher · % | 12 | 5 | -10 | 100 | Green |
| F3 | Maximum statutory/vendor payment delayFinancial Risk · Lower · days | 10 | 30 | 90 | 100 | Green |
| A1 | Pass-rate deviation from national benchmark (abs.)Assessment Risk · Lower · pp | 4 | 10 | 20 | 100 | Green |
| A2 | Batches with missing assessment evidenceAssessment Risk · Lower · % sampled | 1 | 2 | 5 | 100 | Green |
| A3 | Reassessment / appeal rateAssessment Risk · Lower · % | 2 | 3 | 7 | 100 | Green |
| T1 | Data security incidentsTechnology Risk · Lower · count/yr | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Green |
| T2 | Missing mandatory integrations (Kaushal Verse/SIDH/ABC)Technology Risk · Lower · count | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Green |
| T3 | System downtime (assessment/LMS platform)Technology Risk · Lower · hrs/qtr | 2 | 4 | 12 | 100 | Green |
| C1 | MIS/data non-submission instancesCompliance Risk · Lower · count/yr | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | Green |
| C2 | Average delay in regulatory reportingCompliance Risk · Lower · days | 3 | 7 | 20 | 100 | Green |
| C3 | Regulatory violations / show-cause noticesCompliance Risk · Lower · count/yr | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Green |
| L1 | Learner dropout rateTraining & Outcome Risk · Lower · % | 6 | 10 | 20 | 100 | Green |
| L2 | Placement / employment rateTraining & Outcome Risk · Higher · % | 68 | 50 | 30 | 100 | Green |
| L3 | Trainer vacancy rateTraining & Outcome Risk · Lower · % | 5 | 10 | 25 | 100 | Green |
Grading domain breakdown
Weighted domain scores before risk-linked deduction
| Domain | Raw (0–100) | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Governance & Institutional Capacity | 92.0 | 10% | 9.2 |
| D2 Financial Sustainability | 90.0 | 10% | 9.0 |
| D3 Qualification Design & Curriculum (QP-NOS alignment) | 88.0 | 10% | 8.8 |
| D4 Training Delivery & Trainer Quality | 85.0 | 15% | 12.8 |
| D5 Assessment Quality & Integrity | 90.0 | 15% | 13.5 |
| D6 Industry Engagement & Learner Outcomes | 87.0 | 15% | 13.0 |
| D7 Technology & Innovation Enablement | 93.0 | 10% | 9.3 |
| D8 Future Planning, Grievance Redressal & Governance Response | 88.0 | 15% | 13.2 |