NCVET PMU Simulation

REWS & Awarding Body Grading

← Portfolio dashboard

AB-01

TechSkill Sector Council (SSC)

Standard AB · Sector Skill Council (SSC) · IT-ITeS · Karnataka

REWS risk band

Low (0.0)

Letter grade

A+88.8

Escalation

Routine

0 red flag(s)

Renewal readiness

READY – Standard Renewal

Risk narrative

Rule-based

AB-01 TechSkill Sector Council (SSC) carries a Low REWS risk band (composite risk score 0.0) and letter grade A+ (Excellence) after a 0-point risk-linked deduction from a weighted domain score of 88.8. All 18 REWS indicators currently sit in the Green band relative to configured thresholds. Recommended posture: ROUTINE. Renewal readiness: READY – Standard Renewal. Monitoring cadence: Annual review (standard cycle).

Category health scores

Governance Risk

100.0

Weight 15%

Financial Risk

100.0

Weight 20%

Assessment Risk

100.0

Weight 20%

Technology Risk

100.0

Weight 10%

Compliance Risk

100.0

Weight 20%

Training & Outcome Risk

100.0

Weight 15%

Indicator RAG breakdown

CodeIndicatorValueGreenAmberScoreRAG
G1Leadership changes (Chairperson/CEO) in last 12 monthsGovernance Risk · Lower · count001100Green
G2Statutory committees non-functional (Board/Audit/Grievance)Governance Risk · Lower · count001100Green
G3Unresolved conflict-of-interest cases reportedGovernance Risk · Lower · count001100Green
F1Net worthFinancial Risk · Higher · Rs Lakh250500100Green
F2YoY revenue growthFinancial Risk · Higher · %125-10100Green
F3Maximum statutory/vendor payment delayFinancial Risk · Lower · days103090100Green
A1Pass-rate deviation from national benchmark (abs.)Assessment Risk · Lower · pp41020100Green
A2Batches with missing assessment evidenceAssessment Risk · Lower · % sampled125100Green
A3Reassessment / appeal rateAssessment Risk · Lower · %237100Green
T1Data security incidentsTechnology Risk · Lower · count/yr001100Green
T2Missing mandatory integrations (Kaushal Verse/SIDH/ABC)Technology Risk · Lower · count001100Green
T3System downtime (assessment/LMS platform)Technology Risk · Lower · hrs/qtr2412100Green
C1MIS/data non-submission instancesCompliance Risk · Lower · count/yr002100Green
C2Average delay in regulatory reportingCompliance Risk · Lower · days3720100Green
C3Regulatory violations / show-cause noticesCompliance Risk · Lower · count/yr001100Green
L1Learner dropout rateTraining & Outcome Risk · Lower · %61020100Green
L2Placement / employment rateTraining & Outcome Risk · Higher · %685030100Green
L3Trainer vacancy rateTraining & Outcome Risk · Lower · %51025100Green

Grading domain breakdown

DomainRaw (0–100)WeightWeighted
D1 Governance & Institutional Capacity92.010%9.2
D2 Financial Sustainability90.010%9.0
D3 Qualification Design & Curriculum (QP-NOS alignment)88.010%8.8
D4 Training Delivery & Trainer Quality85.015%12.8
D5 Assessment Quality & Integrity90.015%13.5
D6 Industry Engagement & Learner Outcomes87.015%13.0
D7 Technology & Innovation Enablement93.010%9.3
D8 Future Planning, Grievance Redressal & Governance Response88.015%13.2

Decision matrix actions

Regulator (NCVET) actions

• Continue standard annual monitoring cycle.
• Publish entity on 'high-performing' public register (transparency incentive).
• Fast-track future expansion/territorial-jurisdiction requests.
• Consider for peer-mentor role to weaker ABs.
• Light-touch renewal (desk-based, reduced documentation).

Awarding Body actions

• Maintain self-certification & timely MIS/data submission.
• Share good practice with NCVET Research Division for benchmarking.
• Sustain trainer certification & QP-NOS currency.

Global TVET precedent

Ofqual 'low-risk' monitoring tier – reduced inspection frequency; ASQA 'standard' renewal; SkillsFuture Singapore public quality-mark listing.

Monitoring cadence: Annual review (standard cycle)

What-if simulator

Edit raw REWS indicators or domain scores — risk band, grade, and actions recalculate instantly. Try dragging F3 Payment delay upward on a Medium-risk AB.

REWS raw indicators

Grading domain scores (0–100)